Difference between revisions of "Fully Homomorphic Encryption without Modulus Switching"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "This scheme has a number of advantages over previous candidates such as [BGV]. In particular, it uses the same modulus throughout the evaluation process, so there's no need fo...") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | This scheme has a number of advantages over previous candidates such as [BGV]. In particular, it uses the same modulus throughout the evaluation process, so there's no need for modulus switching. Security of these scheme is baed on the hardness of the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lattice_problem GapSVP] problem. | + | This scheme proposed by Brakerski <ref='Brak'>Z. Brakerski, Fully Homomorphic Encryption without Modulus Switching from Classical GapSVP. In: Safavi-Naini R., Canetti R. (eds) Advances in Cryptology – CRYPTO 2012. CRYPTO 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7417. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32009-5_50 </ref> has a number of advantages over previous candidates such as [BGV]. In particular, it uses the same modulus throughout the evaluation process, so there's no need for modulus switching. Security of these scheme is baed on the hardness of the [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lattice_problem GapSVP] problem. |
+ | |||
+ | == Preliminaries == | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==References== |
Revision as of 12:44, 18 January 2021
This scheme proposed by Brakerski <ref='Brak'>Z. Brakerski, Fully Homomorphic Encryption without Modulus Switching from Classical GapSVP. In: Safavi-Naini R., Canetti R. (eds) Advances in Cryptology – CRYPTO 2012. CRYPTO 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7417. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32009-5_50 </ref> has a number of advantages over previous candidates such as [BGV]. In particular, it uses the same modulus throughout the evaluation process, so there's no need for modulus switching. Security of these scheme is baed on the hardness of the GapSVP problem.